#IS STAR TREK RESURGENCE OPEN WORLD CRACK#

#IS STAR TREK RESURGENCE OPEN WORLD CRACK#

If you were going to pick a Star Trek character to try to crack hard-nosed La'an's ( Christina Chong) tough exterior, most people wouldn't immediately jump to James Kirk. His character hasn't been completely retconned - he's still brash, brave, and quick to defy orders - but he's demonstrated an ability to connect and care about people that we rarely saw from TOS Kirk outside of his friendships with McCoy and Spock - relationships it took him years to build. Strange New Worlds, however, has finally given us a Kirk ( Paul Wesley) for the 23rd century, a Kirk who's unafraid to be vulnerable and, as a result, inspires those around him to be vulnerable with him. And when you're not allowed to be vulnerable, it's practically impossible to empathize with anyone else's vulnerability. At the mercy of the incredibly rigid gender roles of the era, Kirk demonstrated an abundance of bravery, anger, righteous indignation, good humor, bemusement, and even regret, but fear and vulnerability were out of his reach. This is partly due, of course, to the era that Kirk comes from - not the 2230s, but the 1960s. but does he do so out of compassion, or simply because he's indignant at being made a spectacle for the Metrons?ĭespite his heroism, his selflessness, and his ability to show compassion, it's hard to imagine anyone crying on his shoulder or pouring their heart out to Jim Kirk. He's capable, at times, of great compassion - he gives Khan ( Ricardo Montalbán) an uninhabited planet to conquer rather than court marshal him simply because he thinks it's a 'waste' to sentence people as gifted as Khan's to a penal colony. In Star Trek Beyond, for instance, when the villain Krall ( Idris Elba) kidnaps part of the Enterprise crew, Kirk risks his life to save them because 'Starfleet doesn't leave people behind.' We can infer that he fears for the safety of his friends and colleagues, but he certainly never lets those emotions show. However, the good deeds of both of these versions of Kirk often seemed to come from a personal need to uphold what’s right rather than a place of caring for the feelings or well-being of others. Kelvin Kirk similarly sacrifices his own life to save his crew in Star Trek Into Darkness, though he's later revived.

In fact, he sacrifices himself in the ultimate heroic deed to save the inhabitants of Veridian IV and the Enterprise-D in Star Trek Generations. He held an unwavering commitment to Starfleet values (despite his apparent eagerness to ignore the chain of command) and was the author of an encyclopedia's worth of heroic deeds, many of them undertaken at great personal risk to himself. That's not to imply that Shatner's Kirk wasn't a good man.

Is star trek resurgence open world